Skip to main content

THE LANGUAGE OF LOVE & MARRIAGE


What can be said of LOVE? Other than it is essential to the existence of the human race. We all naturally feel the urge to show and to receive love. So, if it is an instinct as natural as walking, talking and eating, then how come we haven’t got it right as a race for millions of years? How come we feel short changed in our marriages? How come it is so easy for a couple who once professed love for one another all of a sudden feel the urge to call it quits?

Some say Love is like ‘The state of Utopia’ [desirable but not attainable]. Yet, we see some marriages celebrate their silver jubilees, golden jubilees today and when you ask them what has kept them going for all these years, they are quick to tell you ‘It’s Love’. But somehow, we like to conclude that they must be tolerating each other or out rightly just pretending to themselves or they’re still together because of their children’s sake.

Well, there might just be a logical explanation why some marriages have stood the test of time, remained true and successful, and funny enough, it’s simply for the reason of ‘Genuine Love’ between the couple.

Now, Love can be almost accurately defined as a natural, unconditional and affectionate feeling from one to another. But sadly, as most of us have just found out, that natural, unconditional and affectionate feeling from one to another does not necessarily guarantee a successful married life! We go into courtship [for those who got married by the book] and take our time to ensure that we are marrying our spouse for the right reasons, yet 3-4 years down the line we’re thinking : maybe I made a wrong decision? Maybe I should have married X, YorZ?!

For those at this crossroad in life everything becomes static and their marriage begins to nose dive. We might feel discouraged by all these feelings of disappointment in our marriages, and anytime it’s time to go home we say “NOT AGAIN”!!! But maybe we need to just calm down and reconsider some natural factors. Love in itself is a ‘feeling’ and because of this fact, it makes it impossible for it to be expressed in a universal way. So don’t go comparing your marriage to someone else’s. Each of us have our own understanding of what we call Love; probably based on what makes us ‘TICK’ and this I’ll like to call our own “Language of Love”.

“It is the failure to learn of each others Language of Love before deciding to get married in the first place that makes most of us right now feel that we are in a wrong marriage, OR that our spouse has changed! Because we no longer feel loved! If your spouse stops doing those things that you understand to mean Love or call Love; it is natural for you to feel rubbed in the wrong way about this and you eventually start to become unhappy with the marriage. But maybe if we had considered each others Language of Love before getting married and ensuring that we could satisfy them when we got married, then possibly we wouldn’t be at the state of unhappiness we are right now”.

For example, some people [men and women] interpret giving gifts or receiving gifts to mean “Love”. To these set of people, sharing of gifts speaks volume to them and they immediately feel loved, every other affectionate expressions of Love may not necessarily matter to them. To some; a romantic lunch or dinner will make them feel elated. To some; flattery words of compliments will make their day anytime. To some; a simply well composed poetry of how much they mean to their spouse could lead them to tears. To some; spending time together chatting, sharing secrets and cuddling is their view of Love, while to some; sex is the ultimate key to their hearts!

With this thought at the back of my head, I decided to ask a bunch of friends (singles and married) at a gathering what their personal take on Love was; and unsurprisingly about every single person in the room had a unique interpretation of Love! One even said Love was unattainable with no human being able to fulfill the ‘unconditional’ aspect of Love in its’ true definition. AND THIS MAY JUST BE THE REASON WHY THERE IS A LOT OF DIVORCE IN OUR MARRIAGES TODAY. NO ONE IS PREPARED TO LOVE UNCONDITIONALLY (FOR BETTER OR WORSE, IN SICKNESS OR IN HEALTH, FOR RICHER OR POORER). IF THIS ISN’T SO, THEN ANSWER: HOW MANY OF US WILL REMAIN IN OUR MARRIAGES IF OUR SPOUSE SUDDENLY DEVELOPS A DISABILITY? OR WE FIND OUT 3 YEARS DOWN THE LINE THAT OUR SPOUSE HAS AN UNCONTROLLED SEXUAL CRAVING?!

LOVE IN MOST MARRIAGES TODAY IS ON MORE OF A “SCRATCH MY BACK AND I SCRATCH YOUR BACK” BASIS. WE MAY NOT WANT TO ADMIT IT, BUT THE TRUTH IS MOST OF US TODAY ARE IN A MARRIAGE OF CONVENIENCE! AND AT THE APPEARANCE OF ANY LITTLE DISCOMFORT OR SOMETHING WE DIDN’T ENVISAGE, WE WILL DASH TO THE DOOR.

THIS OUGHT NOT TO BE SO;

IF WE CAN FIND “LOVE” IN OUR MARRIAGES, WE WILL FIND HAPPINESS, AND THIS LOVE THAT WE REFER TO AS “HAPPINESS” WILL ULTIMATELY LEAD TO IMPROVEMENT IN ALL AREAS OF OUR LIFE: WORK/BUSINESS, HEALTH, FRIENDS/NEIGHBOURS AND MOST OF ALL PROSPERITY!

LOVE IS SO MANY WORDS IN ONE “TOLERANCE, FORGIVENESS, PERSEVERANCE, SACRIFICE, CARE, DEDICATION, FORBEARING” ETC.

HAVE A BLESSED WEEK AND REMAIN IN LOVE, BUT MOST OF ALL, EXPRESS LOVE…

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Color of Water by James McBride review - race, identity and transcendence

I once encountered a novel in the African literature section of a London library. It was about an out-of-luck black Nigerian man, Furo Wariboko, who went to bed and woke up transformed into a white man. Nothing else about Furo changes (held the same undergraduate degree, spoke in  Pidgin English  and even retained a  Black ass ), yet his social interactions in the vibrant city of Lagos improved overnight: from offers of high remunerating jobs to excessive deference towards him from his fellow Nigerians; all because of his newly-acquired skin colour. I remember sliding that novel back into the library’s bookshelf, thinking the synopsis around Furo’s life was outlandish even for a work of fiction. Not until I immersed myself into James McBride’s demure memoir,  The Color of Water , in which the author unfurled the life-world of his mother, Ruchel Dwajra Zylska, did I realise that I’d been limited in my imagination to think back then that Furo’s story was outlandish, and that reality can,

Tinubu and end of Village Tree Democracy

The market square humiliation of incumbent governor of Lagos, Akinwunmi Ambode, was excruciating to watch even for a non-supporter. It was a ‘power show’ by Bola Ahmed Tinubu. A demonstration that two decades after ‘great minds think alike’ billboards stood on major Lagos streets – a baseless comparison of himself to Awolowo and Gandhi, except for round-eyed glasses – his ability to steer voters in his preferred direction hasn’t waned. I’m mindful that it’s usually an overestimation when an individual is said to have such power over society. Nevertheless, it’s undeniable that Tinubu’s opinions hold sway in Lagos. Indeed, how Tinubu came about that political power, and how it can be brought to an end, is what I intend to interrogate. Majority of Lagos residents are Yoruba. Like many African sub-nationalities, they hold as ideal that, although individual need is self-evident, community need shall supersede. This is argued convincingly by Professor Segun Gbadegesin – what

Bello, Zik and Awo: Youth, Ambition and Unintended Consequences of Independence.

Pointing finger of blame when looking into history is tempting. But, reading two or more accounts of same historical event, by different witnesses, it becomes clear that there are no absolute-truths in history: just points of view. And requires discipline on our part to piece together for better understanding of the past, to build upon the successes, learn from the mistakes, and where possible and desirable make repairs. From accounts of Ahmadu Bello (My Life), Nnamdi Azikiwe (My Odyssey) and Obafemi Awolowo (Awo), we know the slogan ‘Self-Government for Nigeria NOW’ was demand of the ‘politically conscious’ indigenes. Demand continuously watered since 1923-elections in Lagos and Calabar Provinces, when only Nigerian men who earned £100 annually were allowed to vote. People who constitute Nigeria were never consulted if they so desired to be a ‘nation,’ let alone, be independent. Action Group (AG) would go further, at its Owo Conference of April 1951, declaring ‘SGN in 195