Skip to main content

UK Labour Party and Ethnic Minorities

Southall gripped the nation’s attention in 1979. Immigrants, mainly from the Indian subcontinent, huddled together to repel anti-immigration political party, National Front.


It was one of the frequent race-riots of that era. Blue plaques with names of Gurdip Singh Chaggar and Blair Peach hang on the Town Hall’s brick wall to remind you. And footage of the street altercations, with the police either dispersing protestors or aiding the far-right group, depending on who you ask, survives on YouTube.

But to assume that story a leitmotif for the area is to misunderstand what’s beginning to happen in this west London borough. Pakoras and jalebi still constantly sizzle in hot oil behind kiosks of street food vendors. And rows of shops displaying groceries, sarees, and more Asian wedding accessories under frontal awnings have grown longer in all directions. With HSBC bank, Poundland and Gregg’s appearing like aberrations here. Yet, change has occurred.

Testament to that is, despite the anti-immigration stance of both Leave campaigns during 2016 EU referendum, manifest in that ‘Breaking Point’ poster, this desi-community significantly voted ‘Leave’. Defying Europhile leadership of Ealing-Southall Constituency Labour Party – a branch of the one UK political party that ever thinks itself attuned to feelings of minority communities UK-wide.

That John Tyndall’s National Front once came to town doesn’t activate limbic systems of those who live here now. Many who lived through that fright 40 years ago have upped sticks and moved to Ickenham and other nearby affluent neighbourhoods.

The Indian Workers’ Association (IWA) has also fallen silent. What’s left of that organisation is its banner on a shop building on The Green. Passersby may stare at it like an unlabelled portrait in an art gallery, sensing it’s important enough to be exhibited, but unsure why. How, for example, the organisation acting as ‘social workers’ alongside sympathisers in the Labour Party assisted those first and second waves of male migration from Jullundur and elsewhere to settle here in the fifties and sixties. The men had a new life of form-filling to face in Britain and had no ability to speak English. They had to gain a foothold in employment before later sending for their wives. Later on, protection from exploitation was important too, and 1965 Courtauld’s Red Scar Mill strike is an example of how IWA stood by them.

That, they say, is history

Southall is today a collage of first-generation British-Asians, a growing Somali population and newly-arrived South Asians; all feeling more at home in ‘Little Punjab’ than the past generations ever did.

Its grown into a cluster of family-run small businesses: pharmacies, general practices, restaurant chains, tailoring services and a massive TRS warehouse that distributes Asian spices throughout Britain. Imposing desi-architecture now sits on the landscape in the form of Hindu Mandirs, Sikh Gurduwaras and Muslim Masjids piously overlooking trading activities on King Street and The Broadway.

As a community of enterprise, naturally, Southall residents would love to keep more of their money to spend on their priorities like private education for their children. Labour Party’s instinct of collecting more in income tax and business rate to fund social services may now, understandably, seem an attack on those aspirations.

Splice into that Labour’s Brighton conference motion acknowledging Kashmir’s right of self-determination – a move thats unified Pakistan and India in displeasure – from a party that they frankly no longer need as a scaffolding to navigate British life, and you can begin to foresee breakdown in the party’s relationship with British-Asians.

Simply put, it could, in the nearest future, snowball into what we see today with the British Jewry, a demographic that as mentioned in the 1996 Institute for Jewish Policy Research (JPR) survey, had begun diverging from Labour Party in huge number from at least 1995 on socioeconomic policies and “perceived left-wing bias against Israel”. And that was at the height of Blair’s ‘New Labour’.

Labour’s BAME voters

Labour Party was created in 1900 to improve conditions of white-British working-class. And over time, it intuitively forged an alliance with immigrants who moved into those working-class communities. First, with Jewish refugees who came from Eastern Europe and next, the post-war immigrants from the Caribbean Islands, South Asia and other parts of the Commonwealth.

And now that a tribe of British-born and foreign-born ethnic minorities who are economically confident has swollen into a sizeable voting bloc. And they see no difference between themselves and their white-British middle-class colleagues and spouses (except for the odd gaffe), Labour Party could see its BAME votes potentially decrease going into the future.

For what it’s worth, I have anecdotal evidence of immigrant Nigerian and Ghanaian friends, in London, Milton Keynes and Bristol, who have switched to voting Conservative. They were attracted by Cameron’s ‘Broken Britain’ theme at the 2010 General Election backed by reheated ‘One-Nation Conservatism rhetoric.

Indeed, after the keelhauling at hands of British voters from Scotland to northern England towns, Wales and Northern Ireland at the 2015 polls, many commentators wondered if insolvency proceedings should begin for the Labour Party as they no longer had a purpose in twenty-first century Britain. After all, none other than Labour Deputy Prime Minister, Prescott, had eight years earlier infamously proclaimed: “We are all middle-class now!”

Corbyn has understood the existential need to cultivate a new voting tribe. And not only has he grown Labour party’s membership to be largest in western Europe, but also, in 2017, recorded the party’s highest overall vote share (40%) in a General Election since 2001. This to the amazement of commentators who saw no hope for the party.

Conservative’s ‘One-Nation’ rebranding has at the same time atrophied from habit of ‘small government’ (austerity) and ‘hostile environment’. Both policies have caused a massive spike in child poverty in Britain, and a unique state-bullying of black-Britons termed ‘Windrush Scandal’.

Whatever their fortune in this approaching 2019 winter General Election, to remain an electoral force in looming Age of Self-Driving cars, Labour Party must double down on return to socialist’s principles along lines of the Nordic-Model that’ll continue making a difference in working-class life, especially ‘Green Industrial Revolution’ offer. It should also continue inspiring young Britons who are resigned to inhabit that ‘AI’ future and who now make up a majority of BAME voters.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Color of Water by James McBride review - race, identity and transcendence

I once encountered a novel in the African literature section of a London library. It was about an out-of-luck black Nigerian man, Furo Wariboko, who went to bed and woke up transformed into a white man. Nothing else about Furo changes (held the same undergraduate degree, spoke in  Pidgin English  and even retained a  Black ass ), yet his social interactions in the vibrant city of Lagos improved overnight: from offers of high remunerating jobs to excessive deference towards him from his fellow Nigerians; all because of his newly-acquired skin colour. I remember sliding that novel back into the library’s bookshelf, thinking the synopsis around Furo’s life was outlandish even for a work of fiction. Not until I immersed myself into James McBride’s demure memoir,  The Color of Water , in which the author unfurled the life-world of his mother, Ruchel Dwajra Zylska, did I realise that I’d been limited in my imagination to think back then that Furo’s story was outlandish, and that reality can,

Bello, Zik and Awo: Youth, Ambition and Unintended Consequences of Independence.

Pointing finger of blame when looking into history is tempting. But, reading two or more accounts of same historical event, by different witnesses, it becomes clear that there are no absolute-truths in history: just points of view. And requires discipline on our part to piece together for better understanding of the past, to build upon the successes, learn from the mistakes, and where possible and desirable make repairs. From accounts of Ahmadu Bello (My Life), Nnamdi Azikiwe (My Odyssey) and Obafemi Awolowo (Awo), we know the slogan ‘Self-Government for Nigeria NOW’ was demand of the ‘politically conscious’ indigenes. Demand continuously watered since 1923-elections in Lagos and Calabar Provinces, when only Nigerian men who earned £100 annually were allowed to vote. People who constitute Nigeria were never consulted if they so desired to be a ‘nation,’ let alone, be independent. Action Group (AG) would go further, at its Owo Conference of April 1951, declaring ‘SGN in 195

Tinubu and end of Village Tree Democracy

The market square humiliation of incumbent governor of Lagos, Akinwunmi Ambode, was excruciating to watch even for a non-supporter. It was a ‘power show’ by Bola Ahmed Tinubu. A demonstration that two decades after ‘great minds think alike’ billboards stood on major Lagos streets – a baseless comparison of himself to Awolowo and Gandhi, except for round-eyed glasses – his ability to steer voters in his preferred direction hasn’t waned. I’m mindful that it’s usually an overestimation when an individual is said to have such power over society. Nevertheless, it’s undeniable that Tinubu’s opinions hold sway in Lagos. Indeed, how Tinubu came about that political power, and how it can be brought to an end, is what I intend to interrogate. Majority of Lagos residents are Yoruba. Like many African sub-nationalities, they hold as ideal that, although individual need is self-evident, community need shall supersede. This is argued convincingly by Professor Segun Gbadegesin – what