Skip to main content

RUSSIAN ACTORS, AFRICAN SCRIPT.


Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida (IBB) must be full of envy as he watches Vladimir Putin become president of Russia again. In 2008, the latter relinquished his presidency to protégé, Dmitry Medvedev, because in Russia a president cannot stay in office for three consecutive terms. But unlike IBB, who power eludes since 'stepping aside' from Nigeria's number one seat on that fateful day 26 August 1993, Putin, has gone on to serve as Prime Minister of his country (2008 - 2012) and he's now set to occupy The Kremlin a third non-consecutive time.

However, if you've been following Russia's political scene for the past decade, you will know Putin's latest presidential mandate comes with some level of scepticism from his people. Also, most western leaders frown at oligarchy reign, seeing him metaphorically as a villain from the fictional British spy movie 'James Bond 007'. But, with the new 6-year presidential term in Russia, leaders from the west will have to put their hate aside and find a way to work with Putin for the next 12 years; assuming he gets re-elected in 2018.

Now, as much as you may be tempted to think Russia is in Africa, may I remind you it's a leading country on the European continent. But undoubtedly, operations of its major political party, United Russia Party (URP) bears a resemblance to South Africa's ruling party, African National Congress (ANC) and Nigeria's ruling party, People's Democratic Party (PDP), who also propose a single term of 7-years presidency in Nigeria, which is a subject of ongoing debate at the National Assembly.

Similar to the President of Nigeria, Goodluck Jonathan, Vladimir Putin shunned presidential debates in run-up to the 2012 Russian elections. And just like him, he won the general elections in Russia.

Again similar to Nigeria, is the reaction of opposition parties in Russia. Quick to denounce election results as illegitimate and heading straight to the court to contest it. This despite knowing they didn't get as much votes as the winning candidate. Which in this case ensured approximately 91,000 web-cameras was fixed across all polling stations in the country, streaming Russia's elections in real-time to the world over the Internet.

Not only do international observers acknowledge Putin's victory through pursed lips, they call it a "catch-22". ‘No real alternative to Putin' says Alexander Rahr (German Council on Foreign Relations). A statement also being echoed for South-Africa's upcoming 2014 Presidential elections, where political analysts say ANC cannot be unseated by dissatisfaction of South-Africans alone; alternative candidate from an opposition Party has to be exceptional.

This is what strikes me when drawing comparison between Russia, South-Africa and Nigeria's 'political scenes'. A seeming distrust for the ruling party, yet, each time elections are called, voters restore power to the party in huge numbers ahead of opposition parties at the polls. While the reason for restoring incumbents in Russia and South-Africa may not be far-fetched – being that they’ve helped place their respective countries amongst emerging economies of the world – BRICS. The reason Nigerians restore ruling party, PDP, isn't so clear. Albeit delivering on reforms in the banking and telecommunications industry, they seem to be fumbling in other areas, especially electricity, roads and security - three aspects the people believe if improved will have direct impact on their lives: aiding their productivity and transportation, securing their life and property.

But like Russia and South-Africa, will it be a case of ‘no contest’ when PDP roll out their war-chest for Nigeria's 2015 Presidential elections? Interestingly, the party says it will rule Nigeria for 60 years, 16 is already in the bag and opposition parties appear hapless to stand in way of remaining 44 years of this prophecy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Color of Water by James McBride review - race, identity and transcendence

I once encountered a novel in the African literature section of a London library. It was about an out-of-luck black Nigerian man, Furo Wariboko, who went to bed and woke up transformed into a white man. Nothing else about Furo changes (held the same undergraduate degree, spoke in  Pidgin English  and even retained a  Black ass ), yet his social interactions in the vibrant city of Lagos improved overnight: from offers of high remunerating jobs to excessive deference towards him from his fellow Nigerians; all because of his newly-acquired skin colour. I remember sliding that novel back into the library’s bookshelf, thinking the synopsis around Furo’s life was outlandish even for a work of fiction. Not until I immersed myself into James McBride’s demure memoir,  The Color of Water , in which the author unfurled the life-world of his mother, Ruchel Dwajra Zylska, did I realise that I’d been limited in my imagination to think back then that Furo’s story was outlandish, and that reality can,

Bello, Zik and Awo: Youth, Ambition and Unintended Consequences of Independence.

Pointing finger of blame when looking into history is tempting. But, reading two or more accounts of same historical event, by different witnesses, it becomes clear that there are no absolute-truths in history: just points of view. And requires discipline on our part to piece together for better understanding of the past, to build upon the successes, learn from the mistakes, and where possible and desirable make repairs. From accounts of Ahmadu Bello (My Life), Nnamdi Azikiwe (My Odyssey) and Obafemi Awolowo (Awo), we know the slogan ‘Self-Government for Nigeria NOW’ was demand of the ‘politically conscious’ indigenes. Demand continuously watered since 1923-elections in Lagos and Calabar Provinces, when only Nigerian men who earned £100 annually were allowed to vote. People who constitute Nigeria were never consulted if they so desired to be a ‘nation,’ let alone, be independent. Action Group (AG) would go further, at its Owo Conference of April 1951, declaring ‘SGN in 195

Tinubu and end of Village Tree Democracy

The market square humiliation of incumbent governor of Lagos, Akinwunmi Ambode, was excruciating to watch even for a non-supporter. It was a ‘power show’ by Bola Ahmed Tinubu. A demonstration that two decades after ‘great minds think alike’ billboards stood on major Lagos streets – a baseless comparison of himself to Awolowo and Gandhi, except for round-eyed glasses – his ability to steer voters in his preferred direction hasn’t waned. I’m mindful that it’s usually an overestimation when an individual is said to have such power over society. Nevertheless, it’s undeniable that Tinubu’s opinions hold sway in Lagos. Indeed, how Tinubu came about that political power, and how it can be brought to an end, is what I intend to interrogate. Majority of Lagos residents are Yoruba. Like many African sub-nationalities, they hold as ideal that, although individual need is self-evident, community need shall supersede. This is argued convincingly by Professor Segun Gbadegesin – what