Skip to main content

AN IGBO COUP THAT WAS NOT


A radio broadcast by an unknown Army officer speaking from the northern city of Kaduna. Confidence exudes from his voice as he lays out a new order to every corner of the nation. It is tabula rasa, a fresh start away from disaffection that many in newly independent Nigeria were feeling and muttering under their breaths while riding their bicycles to work, or at beer parlours, and around the dinner table in just five years of independence.

Although uncertain what this new government order was, the listening public felt anything but their present crop of civilian “political profiteers” will do. All were unaware at the time of this broadcast that top officials of the ousted government, objects of public cynicism: a perceived overtly corrupt Finance Minister, Festus Okotie-Eboh; an ex-school teacher and proxy Prime Minister, Tafawa Balewa; the northern region Premier, Ahmadu Bello, whom had undermined the PM by referring to him as his “lieutenant”; and western region Premier, Samuel Akintola, whom had paved way for the emergence of Balewa as PM by entering into a coalition, had all been killed shortly after their arrests, along with senior military officers, Shodeinde and Ademulegun.

By evening of that day, on January 15, 1966, the coup d’etat was thwarted.

This was over a decade before I was born and found out that I am Nigerian. And learnt Igbos eat human beings, Hausa-Fulani are born to rule, and of course, that we Yorubas are victims of these two evils.

                                                              *****

It would be profound hesitation on mom’s and dad’s faces in 1985, when on that fateful Sallah Day, another coup was announced on the radio. Having paused to listen for a while, my parents and other adults present casually returned to eating Ileya meat and other dishes that had been brought over to our house by Muslim neighbours, as is the tradition of Muslims after their long Ramadan Fast to merry with all. The day continued as if what was said on radio had no effect on any of our lives.

I learnt this was the fifth announcement of its kind since that first one in 1966, and by now has lost its element of surprise and purpose, especially with citizens’ quality of lives unimproved. Rather, a gulf of irreconcilable depth had opened up between the people of Nigeria and the leadership by that 1985 Sallah morning. Cynicism had become national disposition towards government.

More journeymen would announce their coups, in 1990, and again in tail-end of 1993. But for that first blow in 1966, no other military coup in Nigeria was again defined by ethnicity of some of the mutineer Army officers. Perhaps, lessons had been learnt from mishandling the first one. Or, it is simply down to BBC subsequently unable to fix the narrative of the Nigerian society, anymore.

                                                              *****

Day 1 after the January 15, 1966 coup. Mother country, Britain, was clear that the Cold War had arrived Nigeria. It was a Communist revolution undertaken by a so-named ‘Revolutionary Council’, a group of University graduates who consumed Marxist-Leninist literature before joining the Nigerian Army, pre-independence.

There was no way Britain would allow these anti-capitalist radicals erode neo-colonial arrangement orchestrated to secure Britain’s interests in Nigeria before departing five years prior. Nor, would allow this be a precedent other of its former colonies follows. More so, when Britain was still economically and psychologically devastated from a World War II, hence, unable to push back demand for independence from its colonies, like Nigeria, in the decade past.

Opportunity to purge these Communist influences in the Nigerian Army who were of southern Nigeria extraction (Yoruba and Igbo), would be presented when it began to filter that eastern region Premier, Michael Opara, was spared, and his counterparts: the western region Premier (Yoruba); the Prime Minister (Fulani) and the northern region Premier (Fulani), killed. Latter doubling as Sardauna of Sokoto, also great-grandson of Sheikh Usman Dan-Fodio, the founder of Fulani Empire. British soft-power – BBC and diplomatic envoy in Nigeria – was deployed.

In the next hundred days that followed, British High Commissioner to Nigeria, Sir Francis Cumming-Bruce toured northern Nigeria to speak with Emirs and other State actors. Simultaneously, a British Army officer had begun counter-insurgency training on the premises of Ahmadu Bello University. Idea that “Igbo aggression” had brought about an Igbo Head of State clogged the Nigerian air.

This was despite fact that on morning of January 16, 1966, Alhaji Zana Buka Dipcharima (Hausa-Fulani), and Acting-President, Nwafor Orizu (Igbo) had asked General Aguiyi Ironsi — giving legitimacy to form a government — to reunite a fractured nation, whose “nationalists”, within short years of independence, had polarised with lazy slogans: North for Northerners; East for Easterners; West for Westerners during political campaigns. 

By Day 130, it had been firmly christened in minds of the public that it was an “Igbo coup”. Enough was not done to dispel this myth. Igbo communities in the north were indeed in jubilatory mood for what they, like many others in the country, saw as overthrow of an oppressive and corrupt elite government. It would then on no longer matter that Lt. Colonel Adekunle Fajuyi, Lt. Colonel Victor Banjo and Major Ademola Ademoyega, all Yorubas, were side by side Compadres: Majors Nzeogwu, Ifeajuna, Okafor and Onwuatuegwu in planning and executing the coup that was to handover initiative to the proletariats to shape their own lives. That, an Igbo, Lt. Colonel Arthur Unegbe, was felled. Also, senior military officers, Shodeinde and Ademulegun, who are Yorubas. That General Ironsi, had only escaped by a life saving phone-call from Lt. Colonel James Pam.

Day 135. May 29, 1966, to be precise. Simultaneous Anti-Ironsi riots erupted in the north killing Igbos in their hundreds at different locations; some persons of other tribal extraction were caught up in it too. A conservative number of one million Igbo children and many more non-combating adults were recorded killed in the Civil War that ensued after a “revenge coup” by northern military officers (Araba Group), in July of same year, 1966.

Though the Head of State, General Ironsi, had been killed, along with the western region Military Administrator, Colonel Adekunle Fajuyi, the revenge coup was unrecognised in the eastern region of Nigeria. The Igbo instead authorised Colonel Odumegwu Ojukwu, the region’s Military Administrator, to declare their land a sovereign State, named Biafra. Taking a cue from Colonel Yakubu Gowon’s August 1, 1966 “…political, economical as well as social, the basis of unity is not there…” speech, which was intended to announce northern Nigeria’s breakaway (See: The Nigerian Civil War, by John de St. Jorre; and Revolution in Nigeria: Another View, by Joseph Garba). Earlier in same year, a month after the first coup, a militia “Delta Volunteer Service” led by Isaac Boro, had on February 23, 1966, announced Delta People’s Republic, a minority ethnic group in the eastern region, independent.
                                
                                                              *****

It is fifty years today that the Communists ‘Revolutionary Council’ struck to create a “just” society, though expressly discriminating against homosexuals. And like all ill-thought-out revolutions, what they heralded was worse than the bourgeoisie civilian government that they sought to replace. Fear of “the other” has heightened among ethnic groupings of Nigeria ever since, the Igbo being the worst affected and still agitating for a ‘Biafra State’. Indeed, the political, economical and social union of Nigeria is still shaky. Many still find it strange that a pupil in Sokoto, has to score 7 to pass a “National” Common Entrance Examination, and their counterpart in Imo, needs score 66 to pass.

Perhaps the cement required to bond — trust — can organically form when we so-named Nigerians understand the past. That the “Igbo coup” was not. That Biafra seceded from an illegitimate government. That politics, like international relations, is about creating public disaffection for votes, or to protect interests. That who you are, what part of Nigeria you are from, your family ties, should not determine your status in society.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Color of Water by James McBride review - race, identity and transcendence

I once encountered a novel in the African literature section of a London library. It was about an out-of-luck black Nigerian man, Furo Wariboko, who went to bed and woke up transformed into a white man. Nothing else about Furo changes (held the same undergraduate degree, spoke in  Pidgin English  and even retained a  Black ass ), yet his social interactions in the vibrant city of Lagos improved overnight: from offers of high remunerating jobs to excessive deference towards him from his fellow Nigerians; all because of his newly-acquired skin colour. I remember sliding that novel back into the library’s bookshelf, thinking the synopsis around Furo’s life was outlandish even for a work of fiction. Not until I immersed myself into James McBride’s demure memoir,  The Color of Water , in which the author unfurled the life-world of his mother, Ruchel Dwajra Zylska, did I realise that I’d been limited in my imagination to think back then that Furo’s story was outlandish, and that reality can,

Bello, Zik and Awo: Youth, Ambition and Unintended Consequences of Independence.

Pointing finger of blame when looking into history is tempting. But, reading two or more accounts of same historical event, by different witnesses, it becomes clear that there are no absolute-truths in history: just points of view. And requires discipline on our part to piece together for better understanding of the past, to build upon the successes, learn from the mistakes, and where possible and desirable make repairs. From accounts of Ahmadu Bello (My Life), Nnamdi Azikiwe (My Odyssey) and Obafemi Awolowo (Awo), we know the slogan ‘Self-Government for Nigeria NOW’ was demand of the ‘politically conscious’ indigenes. Demand continuously watered since 1923-elections in Lagos and Calabar Provinces, when only Nigerian men who earned £100 annually were allowed to vote. People who constitute Nigeria were never consulted if they so desired to be a ‘nation,’ let alone, be independent. Action Group (AG) would go further, at its Owo Conference of April 1951, declaring ‘SGN in 195

Tinubu and end of Village Tree Democracy

The market square humiliation of incumbent governor of Lagos, Akinwunmi Ambode, was excruciating to watch even for a non-supporter. It was a ‘power show’ by Bola Ahmed Tinubu. A demonstration that two decades after ‘great minds think alike’ billboards stood on major Lagos streets – a baseless comparison of himself to Awolowo and Gandhi, except for round-eyed glasses – his ability to steer voters in his preferred direction hasn’t waned. I’m mindful that it’s usually an overestimation when an individual is said to have such power over society. Nevertheless, it’s undeniable that Tinubu’s opinions hold sway in Lagos. Indeed, how Tinubu came about that political power, and how it can be brought to an end, is what I intend to interrogate. Majority of Lagos residents are Yoruba. Like many African sub-nationalities, they hold as ideal that, although individual need is self-evident, community need shall supersede. This is argued convincingly by Professor Segun Gbadegesin – what