Skip to main content

THE HOUSE ALWAYS WINS.


I thought it wild but attainable, Brazil to beat Japan four nil, Germany 2006 World Cup. A £10 bet on that score line at the bookies would return £110. More encouraging was a friend’s telephone call that morning saying he won huge by predicting correctly results of 10 accumulated football matches. It was a period of celibacy for me gambling wise, but today the unction had return.

Two hours later, Brazil won the match scoring 4 goals, save for Japan’s Tamada uncharacteristically scoring first. 4 -1 it ended, illusion of being £100 richer gone; reality is, I had lost my tenner…again.

The actual danger of gambling surprisingly lies in winning a bet. By this, you enter into ‘Self Hypnosis’ – convinced beyond doubt it works, becoming addicted. I had once won a couple of hundreds on dog-racing, which began two-years of daily stakes, believing fortune would shine on me again, especially when people around me testify to winning a few quid here and there.

“We’re already too dependent on gambling revenue, if we continue, we’ll soon be owned by them” – Donald L. Carcieri (Governor of Rhode Island 2003 – 2011)

Isn’t that what happens in Nigeria? People give donations and pay tithes to churches in anticipation of a hundred or a thousand times manifold return. Testimony time usually goes like this: Praise the LORD, “I gave my salary to the church last month and this month I got a promotion at work”. “I gave Papa my car last year and my son got healed” [these are real testimonies]. Amidst people receiving such goodies, one would be encouraged to participate in this giving less and receiving more game, which if compared to gambling is a theory of greed.

Why do we conveniently ignore the real needs around us but run to church to make donations? Prostate cancer and Fibroid is prevalent among Nigerian men and women between 40 – 55 years-old. Malaria and Typhoid murders more Nigerian children Under-5 than AIDS. We don’t give toward funding research programmes into their cure or control, yet we’re quick to release funds to religious sects, why? Well, the answer is simple; we’ve been promised irresistible odds of 100:1 and 1,000:1, encouraging us to gamble in guise of having faith.
Non-Government Clinic in London

Principle of giving to receive in future is a law of nature, having nothing to do with religion. Whether Christian, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist or Pagan it’ll work and you don’t have to give to people who share your religious belief before it does. In Science, Newton observes: “Every action has an equal amount of reaction”. Eastern karma culture says: “Whatever you do will come back to you; good or bad”. Philosophy calls it Altruism and Zoologists confirms even animals observe it. You also breathe out carbon-dioxide to receive oxygen, while plants breathe out oxygen to receive carbon-dioxide. Anyone selling you this natural phenomenon as their “god’s blessings”– is a fraud.    

I wonder if bookmakers pride themselves at making people rich by setting odds encouraging them to gamble. Well that’s what the churches are doing. Land of Shiloh, Redemption Camp, Gathering of Champions, Love World, they call themselves, asking people to stake their funds and await a supernatural release of double-double.

If your goal is to be a millionaire, waiting on lottery winnings may just be lifelong. You have to take personal responsibility to pursue that goal in a logical way. One or two people winning lotteries (testimony time) shouldn’t encourage you to put your little into that bottomless well.

For sure we get excited when lottery companies pay-out, but we forget the money they’re  paying is only an accumulation of monies we’ve donated, which mind you, are only estimates*. Also, have you asked yourself what lottery organisers do with the monies in roll-over weeks? Tens to Hundreds of million pounds in right hands will yield in a day benefits you can’t imagine. It is worse with religious centres, because you don’t get to win it back; you’re instead expected to await a new supply from the invincible realm.

You will never find a millionaire or billionaire at a corner shop buying a lottery ticket. They have better schemes to think about than making someone else rich. They own the horses you bet on at The Grand Nationals and possibly a Gaming Licence, which they use to design various lotteries for the poor; ripping you off while paying a few with your money.

Bookmakers, Lottery Organisers and “god businesses” are more interested in their own existence than your financial well-being. They're the only businesses that open more outlets during an economic recession, psychologically, people are more inclined to gamble when in lack. And ultimately, the game of chance ends with only one winner...I'm sure you know who. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Color of Water by James McBride review - race, identity and transcendence

I once encountered a novel in the African literature section of a London library. It was about an out-of-luck black Nigerian man, Furo Wariboko, who went to bed and woke up transformed into a white man. Nothing else about Furo changes (held the same undergraduate degree, spoke in  Pidgin English  and even retained a  Black ass ), yet his social interactions in the vibrant city of Lagos improved overnight: from offers of high remunerating jobs to excessive deference towards him from his fellow Nigerians; all because of his newly-acquired skin colour. I remember sliding that novel back into the library’s bookshelf, thinking the synopsis around Furo’s life was outlandish even for a work of fiction. Not until I immersed myself into James McBride’s demure memoir,  The Color of Water , in which the author unfurled the life-world of his mother, Ruchel Dwajra Zylska, did I realise that I’d been limited in my imagination to think back then that Furo’s story was outlandish, and that reality can,
Post a Comment
Read more

Bello, Zik and Awo: Youth, Ambition and Unintended Consequences of Independence.

Pointing finger of blame when looking into history is tempting. But, reading two or more accounts of same historical event, by different witnesses, it becomes clear that there are no absolute-truths in history: just points of view. And requires discipline on our part to piece together for better understanding of the past, to build upon the successes, learn from the mistakes, and where possible and desirable make repairs. From accounts of Ahmadu Bello (My Life), Nnamdi Azikiwe (My Odyssey) and Obafemi Awolowo (Awo), we know the slogan ‘Self-Government for Nigeria NOW’ was demand of the ‘politically conscious’ indigenes. Demand continuously watered since 1923-elections in Lagos and Calabar Provinces, when only Nigerian men who earned £100 annually were allowed to vote. People who constitute Nigeria were never consulted if they so desired to be a ‘nation,’ let alone, be independent. Action Group (AG) would go further, at its Owo Conference of April 1951, declaring ‘SGN in 195
Post a Comment
Read more

Tinubu and end of Village Tree Democracy

The market square humiliation of incumbent governor of Lagos, Akinwunmi Ambode, was excruciating to watch even for a non-supporter. It was a ‘power show’ by Bola Ahmed Tinubu. A demonstration that two decades after ‘great minds think alike’ billboards stood on major Lagos streets – a baseless comparison of himself to Awolowo and Gandhi, except for round-eyed glasses – his ability to steer voters in his preferred direction hasn’t waned. I’m mindful that it’s usually an overestimation when an individual is said to have such power over society. Nevertheless, it’s undeniable that Tinubu’s opinions hold sway in Lagos. Indeed, how Tinubu came about that political power, and how it can be brought to an end, is what I intend to interrogate. Majority of Lagos residents are Yoruba. Like many African sub-nationalities, they hold as ideal that, although individual need is self-evident, community need shall supersede. This is argued convincingly by Professor Segun Gbadegesin – what
Post a Comment
Read more